11-27-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1995 (#10 - #2066 Robert and Iris Waadc - Continued) Gaffron reported that the application was for a number of variances and additions to a home located on the east side of Shoreline Drive. The house ts located within the 0-75 zone The original proposal was to add a second stor>- to the home with a 10 1. pitched roof The Plannina Commission said that this would be too much for the lot and could not recommend approval The applicant then came back with a proposal tonust a pitched roof over the existing one-stor%- home with a number ot additions^ The carm^rt ^ area is to be built in and used as lixing space The garage would be added ^ a third stall. There would be a bump out in one area, and the entr>- way would be squared off There would also be an angled addition The root would also be pitche over the carport area No height variance is required. The side setback requirement is 30V The garage is currently at 8 ’ and is proposed at 16V The carport bump out is located at 10’ where 30’ is required. The eiitrv wav and root overhang is located in the 0-75 ’ zone Regarding the average lakeshore setback line, the house to the north does not view the prooeitv The house to the south already has limited view. The Planning Commission did not feel this was an issue. The hardcover of bituminous walkway located under the deck would be changed to a non-hardcover of uravel with no underlavment A back out apron and ^rca would be created eliminating the loop Hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone would decrea^ from 39.18% to 36 14Vo Hardcover in the 75-250' zone would decrease from 16,o to 9.25 o. The lot coverage by structure is proposed at 15.37% where 15°o is allowed Waade noted that the 4’ overhangs would be eliminated and rebuilt to 1-1/2*. .All of the additions are within the original overhang depth. llurr asked if Ihere was any way to keep the lot coverage within the 15V. allowable Waade said he made an attempt to do so but was unable to create a functional t oor p an. The garage area would be increased from 2 stalls to 3 with one stall being 30’ in length. It was noted that there are no storage sheds on the propertv. GafVron reported that the 37^o overage in lot coverage amounts to 100 s.f. Hurr said it was her opinion that the lot coveraue should meet the 15*^ 0 allowable. Waaue asked if the overhang was considered. Gatfron explained that the overhang is not included in either the hardcover or lot coverage calculations Goetten said she appreciated the concern with the lot cov erage exceeding I S^/o but looked at the significant improvements to the property She expressed her appreciation of the proposal Goetten moved. Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3633.