Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR ORONO CITY' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 13,1W5 <br />()!^ - #2065 Scotch Pine Lane - Continued) <br />Kclle>’ inquired if the HilTs had lakeshore property. Gafiron said the lot to the lakeshore <br />was a narrow strio. The HilF$ had two seoarate tax statements <br />Gaflron said an outlet was created by the shared dmeway serving the Hill and Martield <br />properties. The road when vacated would be split up between the three parties The <br />HilTs would then have one lot A portion of the cul-de-sac w ould become part of the <br />Toles property, who will have a new driveway off ot CoRd 51 <br />In discussions with the Long Lake Fire Department and the City Engineer, the emergency <br />access was reviewed The current layout is excellent for emergencies but the fire <br />department determined, with additional driveway width, the vacation could occur and still <br />allow room for emergency vehicle staginit The Citv Engineer initiallv Questioned this <br />decision and recommended denial. He raised the issues ot wetland easements and <br />definition, and drainage It was determined that the current catch basin would be <br />eliminated and filled in to allow for overland drainage. <br />GanVon reported that the Public Works Director and Orono Police Department reviewed <br />the orooosal and recommended aooroval The Citv would no lonuer be reauired to <br />maintain the road As part of the packet, documentation provided by the applicants notes <br />the problem with the public attempting to gain access to the lake via Scotch Pine Lane, <br />which has no access. The Hennepin County Public Works Department has also given <br />their preliminary approval The Planning Commission recommended approval bv a 4:1 <br />vote. <br />Gaffron said there was a problem with the high number of utility easements in the area <br />and the concer.i with sewer lines and connections This would need to be addressed prior <br />to final approval Gafiron noted that the pow t line running along the perimeter lot line <br />falls outside of the proposed 10' easement It was further noted that the owners would <br />give the n ccssary casements. <br />Gafi'.on was asked if the City w as attempting to clean up the utility easements because of <br />the proposal Gafiron said it was brought up by the yacation but the need was there for <br />the easements to be addressed <br />Gafii on questioned the vacation of the public road and the replat He noted rural zoning <br />required two acre parcels for any new development Also, any new development would <br />require a private road to be built to the standards which this road currently meets <br />Gafiron questioned vacating and eliminating a road that would be required today to serve <br />these three lots.