Laserfiche WebLink
CITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3 0 <br />9.The neishbors in attendance at the public hearing and the <br />Sacent-neiahbora have all e-.-outaged the Ot>- to <br />vanances thit would allow an “!"ewt <br />driveway remain in its present condition and stams as a dn\e a.. <br />The Ctv Attomev. Thomas Barrett, has drafted a memo to the City staff <br />Affirming that it is within the City ’s authority to grant itself varianc.s. <br />The Planmng Commission at their May 15. 1995 meeting recomrnended that the <br />Citv vrant variances to Section 11.33. Subdivision 43 that would allow Ctty <br />dnvewav to re.main in its present condition otoviding access to two additional <br />tsidential properties via a single carb cut. based on the following umque tindmg <br />and hardships: <br />A. <br />B. <br />The two residential lots shall be served by a single curb cut. <br />t. <br />F. <br />The Citv driveway is approximately 1.000+ ’ in length. ^ar'd <br />single ciirb cut is located 55’ from the intersection of County Road 84/0 <br />Crv'stal Bay Road and the City driveway. <br />All neichbors in attendance at the public hearing and <br />supFon'and encourage the City to grant vanances that would allow th <br />road to remain at its present status and condition. <br />The two existing residential units. Park Presene. <br />facility ate located within 650 ’ and 1.000’ from the intersection of Old <br />Crystal Bay Road and the Cit>’ drive. <br />At the time of the residential subdivision of the City property, it w-as the <br />intent and voal of the City to retain the simple gravel drive as an ac <br />” the resiaential development and tf.e Park Preserve. It continues to <br />remam a goal of :be City. <br />Th- upvrarte .f mis roadway to a 34’ paved width with 3’ ditches and 80’ <br />^I'de^sac at the northeast end would have a negative impact on the <br />Preserve Park-like atmosphere surroundmg the City s dnve. <br />Pase 3 of 9