Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 <br />(#8 -#2062 Ted Rozeboom/Josephine Knudson - Continued) <br />Commissioners noted they would not want to sec any outw’ard e^ridcnce of a business or <br />any parking. <br />Vote; Ayes 3, Hawn, Smith, RowieKe; Nays 3, Peterson, Schroeder. Lindquist. Motion <br />fails. <br />The applicant asked if it would work if his wife owned the propertv'. Peterson said that <br />would set a bad precedent. Smith said specific ground rules need to be laid. <br />Rowlette moved. Smith seconded, to table .Application #2062 to allow applicant time to <br />consider other possible solutions. Ayes 6. Nays 0. <br />(#9) #2063 GERALD AND CANDACE ROWLETTE, 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Lindquist moved. Smith seconded, to table Application #2063 at the request of the <br />applicants. Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#10) #2066 ROBERT AND IRIS W A.ADE, 1487 SHORELINE DRTVE - <br />VARIANCE‘S PUBLIC HEARING 10:33-10:59 P.M. <br />The CerrifiLdte of .Mailing and .Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />The applicants were present. <br />Gaffion reponed that the application is for a number of variances for a 3rd-level addition <br />to a lakeshore property located off of Shoreline Drive in a 2-acre zoning district. The <br />house currently exists at 21' from the shoreline with the deck 16' from the shoreline. .A <br />brruminous waJkwav is located under the deck near the lake. There is an S.j side setback <br />where 30' is required. The average lakeshore setback currently encroaches 13' for the <br />house and 24* for the deck and would remain the same under the proposal. Hardcover in <br />the 0-75’ exists at 28.1% for smtctural and 11.1% for non-structuraJ for a total of 39.2%. <br />The lot coverace by structure is proposed at 13.8®o meeting the 15% allowable. <br />There would not be much of a change in the footprint of the house. The proposal is for <br />what is by definition a three-story’ home by eliminating the existing flat roof and adding <br />anotlier level over the main level and basement, which is considered a story’ with its 18 <br />courses. The street side of the residence is a walk-in with the proposed story' to be <br />located above that. The floor plan shows a car pon on the main level open with a roof, <br />and proposed with a second story'. The pitch of the roof would be 10; 12. The height of <br />the residence meets the ordinance at 28-1/2’ as normally defined; but the house is 46' in <br />total around-to-peak height from the lakeside view.