Laserfiche WebLink
: t V <br />Zoning Flic #2065 <br />September 14, 1995 <br />Page 7 <br />Options for Action <br />1.Approval as proposed, subject to: <br />«Applicants obtaining formal Hennepin County DOT approval. <br />-Subject to confirmation of location of existing utilities, to be relocated or <br />easements granted for them. <br />•Replat subject to standard drainage and utility easements. <br />Subject to delineation of wetland and granting of conservation and flowage <br />easement over wetland. <br />-Subject to grading and drainage plan approved by City Engineer/Public Works <br />Department prior to final plat approval. <br />Specific variances to be granted in replat include: <br />•Lot area and width, all lots. <br />•Lot area and setback (150% standard), Marfield back lot. <br />•Others as may be subsequently found during review process <br />-Aj part of any recommendation for approval. Planning Commission should <br />sp-ecify how this proposal for this neighborhood is unique as compared to other <br />similar three-lot subdivisions, and defining why this one might be approved while <br />others might not be. <br />2.Table for further information (specify). <br />3.Denial (provide specific reasons). <br />4. <br />Isv <br />Other.