Laserfiche WebLink
r'MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSIONMEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 <br />(#14 - #2056 Michael & Barbara Wigie>' - Conunued) <br />Hawn said if the boulder wails were wanted to hold soil before revegetatioa, a landscaper <br />should be ^le to provide plants that germinate quickly Silt fencing was noted to be an <br />option to prevent erosion into the lake while vegetation was germinating. <br />Peterson moved, Schroeder seconded, to table .Application ^2QS6 tor redesigning and <br />gaining of a MCWT) permit. .Ayes 6. Nays 0. <br />Lindauist said the wails would more than likely be denied by the lake and is not in tavor of <br />going ahead with this proposal. <br />Schroeder said if erosion was clearly shown, then he w ould be willing to lOok at the <br />proposal. <br />Smith said she did not see the project to include boulder walls <br />The applicant responded that her major concern for the project was the safet>- of her <br />children <br />(#15) #2057 JAMES N YSTROM, 1745 CO.NCORDLA STREET - V.VRLANCES - <br />PUBUC HEARLNG 10:58-11:22 P..M. <br />The Cenlhcaie of Mailing and .Affidavit oi Publication were noted <br />Nlr. Nystrom and his architect, Greg Frazee, were present <br />Gaffron repcned that the application has been amended and is now proposed as a <br />residential tear down and replacement. The pnncipai structure is presently located within <br />the 0-75' zone and is proposed at the 75' line with a 10' wide deck encroaching the 0-75 <br />zone The detached aaraee will also be taken down and reconstruaed to meet the setback <br />requirements. Hardcover'in the 0-'5' zone would be significantiy reduced with increases <br />s’nown in the 75-250' and significantly so in the 250-500' zone The side setback is <br />proposed at 9 5' ..here 10' is required. The average lakeshore setback :s also an issue to <br />the house on the nonh. <br />Lindquist asked if the deck and house could be moved back 10'. resulting in no hardcover <br />in the 0-7f zone Frazee said this couid be done but preferred the proposed scenano. <br />The house to the south e.xtends into the '5' setback with a porch toucrang the side lot line. <br />With the proposed house located a: the 75' line. *t allows the appLicant to maintain the <br />same view- as the neighbor and the ability to look beyond the house Lf the house is moved <br />back 10', the view of the lake would be limited. <br />Lindquist said he had a problem with any structure in the 0-75'.