Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COM^^SSlON <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 20, 1995 <br />(#1 - #2000 - Cortlcn Cloutier - Continued) <br />be treated as an already designated lot or not <br />r:=sr <br />boathouse He had installed a 3-season porch on top ot the boathouse and said <br />thought he had been given verbal approval to do so by the building mspector at that time^ <br />Mabisth said that the permit on He was given for a single story boathouse only <br />Rowlette informed the appUcant of the City's desire to hav e no structures m the 0-75 <br />zone If the boathouse is to be repaired, and the cost would more than 50 . ot the <br />value of the boathouse at the time of the 1975 code, the boathouse must be removed. No <br />repairs can be done without a pemiit. <br />Rowlette said she would like to have the city attorney's opimon on whether there would be <br />anv rights grandfathered to the property if it had been lega% combined Mabusth <br />te^oSedTo the netuttve saving that the cunent code would apply to the P'op«^, <br />Sist agreed thm any lurther division of lots 3 and 4, once lot I was approved tor <br />subdivision, would have to follow the current codes <br />\olan reiterated to the applicant that if he desires any future division of the lots, the <br />commission needs to see the plan at this lime Cloutier responded that <br />be concerned with future division at this time, only the one lot as ^ t!fhl <br />U A fh„t th^ nr^sert olan for lot 1 could mean that lot 3 would not be able to be <br />:idS: rlTb«al::nhe issue of access and would be sub,ec. ,o cunent <br />fl^dards The commission members suggested m the applicant that h^ come back <br />the commission with an amended application with plans for all the lots. <br />Mabusth said, once again, that the subdivision could be done with a simple metes and <br />b^nd subdtvasion, Mabusth put the applicant on notice .hat ^y ^ <br />would need a new plat due to the access issue. The cunent code may "O' f <br />t:Z rot Tsfen " :.ar:S fnThe applicarr the intentions of the applicant needed to <br />be known at this time <br />The anolicant said he had no plans at this time but that his children said they would like to <br />see a L^ture division of lots 3 and 4, therefore, requested tabling of the application. <br />Mabusth said the property would have to be replatted.