Laserfiche WebLink
1ST- <br />?->v; <br />M WUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9,1995 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />There was no Planning Commisaon report. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public comments. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />(•#3) #2044 GEORGE OLSON, 2775 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE - <br />RESOLUTION #3610 <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution #3610 granting a hardcov er <br />variance to George Olson of 2775 Shadj'wood Road for the construction of an addition <br />to the existing residence Ayes 5, Nays 0 <br />(#4) #2049 CHIC DWIGHT/TRED GUTTORMSON, 1220 TONKAWA ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3611 <br />The applicants were present. <br />Gaffi-on reported that the application is for a request for hardcover and lakeshore setback <br />variances for a number of projects The applicants would like to replace the existing deck <br />on the lakeshore side of the residence, build a screened porch below the deck area, <br />excavate to the south side of the residence for a walkout door, and construct low' boulder <br />waUs, all of which is in the 0-75* zone. The current setback to the lake is 42’ from the <br />residence and 34' from the deck. <br />During Planning Commission re'^ew of August 21, 1995, the applicant received a partial <br />recommendation for approval of a screened porch under the deck and deck replacernent <br />and stairs The approval was based on the deck not exlending past the south wall ot the <br />residence Excavation to the south side wall and retaining walls to allow a window <br />become a doorway was recommended The Planning Commission did not recommend <br />the installation of the low boulder walls between the deck and shoreline as there was no <br />justification or hardship shown The approval was based on the condition that the small <br />patio below the deck be removed, as well as the small acces.sory building on the southeast <br />section of the property Ilte old gravel driveway was recommended to be top dressed <br />and reveuetated with full grass The applicant was also asked to remove the deck by the <br />lake Gaifron also noted That the DNR lecommended denial of the deck and screened <br />porch based on the fact that the property is non-conforming.