Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2044 <br />September 11, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />The only additional hardcover which could be removed to decrease the 75-250’ percentage is in <br />the existing driveway, which varies from 16’ to 25' in width. Narrowing this may reduce guest <br />parking ability. The 195 s.f. utility shed is a possible structural hardcover removal, but would <br />eliminate needed storage space. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Are the proposed removals of virtually all landscape bed hardcovei sufficient, or should <br />additional items of hardcover be reduced? <br />2. Does Planning Commission concur with staff that an after-the-fact building permit and <br />construction inspection should be required for the above-deck screen porch constructed <br />without permits? <br />3. Does Planning Commission have any other concerns about this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Any recommendation for approval should identify the hardships and justification for the <br />hardcover variance approval; should specify removals required in order to approve the current <br />request; and should address the issue of the screen porch construction. <br />Opt ions for Action <br />1. .\pprove as proposed. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Approve with funher reductions. <br />Table for further information. <br />Deny. <br />Other. <br />■ <br />y <br />\ <br />O <br />f <br />t i.1 \u <br />ch