09-25-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

mbsutes of the regular orono city council MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1995 (#9 - #2051 Michad HilbeJink/John Vogt - Continued) Mabusth said there is an issue of ttv'O drain outlets on the east side of the property by the Peterman Addition and directed along the lot line to Old Crystal Bay Road. The outlets serve no function and can be closed according to the Engineer. The access for three lots will be served by private road, writh lot 4 to the south by e.Kisting curb cut that served the original house. It was noted that it a new road were put in on the east side, it would create 4 thru lots in the Peterman addition and j thru lots in the current proposal with a lot surrounded on three sides by a road It was determined to be best served bv an internal road, one reason of which to move around the forested area Hurr asked about two alternate septic sites shown in a stand of trees. Hilbelink said a secondary site was in the stand ot trees with the principal, halt in and halt out He noted that if a road were to be located to the east, it w ould be difficult to find two alternate septic sites. Hurr asked about the 10 ’ and 1 5‘ easements. The first 200 ’ would be adjacent to the road, according to Cook, due to the wetlands on the property The 15’ would be required to stay out of the tree line It was noted that the easements were already granted for the trail The trail will be built this month. The value of the acreage would be deducted against the 8®"o park dedication Hurr moved. Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3601. Ayes 3, Nays 0. (#10) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - V ARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3602 The applicant was represented by architect. Greg Frazee. Gartron noted that the application is for a number of variances The original proposal was for an addition located 23 ’ from the lake The Planning Commission was not in favor of the addition. An amended proposal was presented for a new house located at the 75’ setback line with a 10 ’ deck encroaching the 0-75 ’ zone The proposed new garage was proposed at a central location, which would meet setback requirements. Hardcover was proposed at 10 l°o in the 0-7S' /one. 1 l®o in the 75-2.’^0' /one. and at 6(^/o in the 250- 500' zone The Planning Commission saw no justification in encroaching the 0-75' zone with a deck and asked for the house and deck to be moved back out of the zone The side setback was to change from 10 ’ to 0 6 ’ It was noted by the applicant’s architect that any change in the house width would adversely affect the room sizes Gafffon reported the present proposiil shows the house out of the 0-75' zone with hardcover at 35^o in the 75-250’ zone and at 60% in the 250-500 ’ zone. A new reconfiguration of the driveway eliminates a large portion of blacktop Hurr said she saw no hardship for a side setback variance.