Laserfiche WebLink
Request for CouncQ Actkjn cootimjcd <br />page 3 <br />Sqjtembcr 6, 1995 <br />Zoning File #2036 Robert J. Gountanis, 1098 Loma Linda Avenue <br />B.Right side setback. <br />Required = 10’ <br />Existing = -6" <br />Original proposal — 3’ <br />Amended proposal = 12' <br />No variance required. <br />C.Street setback. <br />Required = 35’ <br />Existing = 5.4* <br />Original proposal = 5.4’ <br />Amended proposal = 13’ <br />Variance = 22’ or 62.8% <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.Does the reduction in the building pad size meet the intent of the Council (originally <br />proposed at 1,492.7 s.f and now at 1.466.5 s.f.)? <br />2.Does the reduction in hardcover satisfy the intent of the Council? Hardcover in the 0-75 <br />setback area has been reduced from 20.5% in the original proposal to 17.8%, and in the <br />75-250’ setback area the original proposal was at 65.9% and is now proposed at 60%. <br />3.The garage addition has now been moved to the north side yard located 3^ from the side <br />lot line and is shown at two stories. Approximately V4 of the 22’ x 22’ pad has been <br />tucked within original 26’ x 38.5’ principal structure pad. Has relocating the garage to <br />the north lot line minimized the impact of the second story? Should the area of the <br />second floor above gat age be reduced? <br />The original approval resolution has been altered so that the resolution can be amended <br />to reflect Council ’s final action. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQL^STED: <br />To either deny, approve or amend revised proposal <br />J