Laserfiche WebLink
r ^ <br />(#9 - i^20l4 James Nystrora - Continued) <br />j j . »,w. Anniicaiion »2014 to allow time for new plans Peterson moved, Nolan seconded, to table App <br />to be drawn. Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS <br />(#,0) «006 JAMES BRICE. 565 LEAF STREET - SKETCH <br />PL.VN/SUBDI\TSIO> <br />James Bruce was present <br />. (T of the Stielow Addition. This property <br />This sketch plan is for a 3-lot suodivision ° f o 1 acres from an adjacent <br />consists of 5.9 acres, and the applicant property is within the <br />neighbor to meet the area requfremeru. i a stubs are now in, and one <br />ML^A. and seucr .a avadable 6cm would be <br />additional connecnon would be ^ ^e located near the shared lot lines, <br />required and would encroach lots - ivailable as property is served with <br />credit for the wetlands u^pact on the <br />Nolan asked the appUcant what is In Sf^hem wooded ar^a. and <br />The appUcant said he telt «ked for clari6cation on <br />the drainage easement could be ^ „p against the setback. <br />CLT> for thLubditasion would .e required if drainageway ts relocated. <br />Rowlette asked if there was any lake view on this property. The applicant said that foete <br />was a minimal view in the wintertime. <br />vr K Rth <uiid if the miesthouse were *0 remain as a separate residence, the applicant <br />"oTe the area standard for a ,. ^ouse would not be met. <br />The access to the property was discussed as tw to^i^^t^cuUot 3 ^n half <br />n X'co^gt sation .. lot 3 and taking the portion of the <br />dnveway out of the west side of lot 2.