My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1995
>
09-11-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 12:48:21 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 12:43:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 2S, 1995 <br />(#7 - #2046 Lakeview Golf - Continued) <br />Kelley asked, with the escalation of real estate values, should a future extension of <br />development occur that the resolution mandates the structure being removed. Gaflron <br />said the required covenants stipulate that the acreage could be no less than 17 acres or <br />would require tla building to come down <br />Wenkstem said it was possible that the work would not get done this season and asked <br />about a renewal or the best way to go about it. A CUP is good tor a year trom the date it <br />is approved A permit could be obtained w ith a follow-up six months later Hurt said if a <br />grading permit was obtained and the codes met, this would be approved. <br />Jabbour moved, Hurr seconded, to approve Application #2046 Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />The contractor asked about burning permits on site with diseased elms Jabbour said the <br />MPCA is the agency that does not allow the burning Callahan told him to speak with <br />Gerhardson about a permit. Gerhardson noted logs can be burned but not brush. A <br />permit is good for a certain p>eriod of time <br />(#8) #2054 TONY EIDEN CO.MPANY. 2700 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE WEST- <br />CONDinONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION #3593 <br />Charles Dillerud represented the Eiden Company. <br />Mabusth reported that the application involved the filling of 600 cubic yards for a <br />walkout design residence. The property has positive drainage and no change would <br />occur in the existing drainage patterns. A type 1 wetland to the northwest receives the <br />majority of drainage from the lot The applicant is asked to create a swale on the south <br />side of the driveway so no drainage flows to the septic areas. An inspection will occur to <br />ensure that erosion control is in place. <br />Goetten noted that the monument application under consideration at the Planning <br />Commission meeting had no representation The applicant was informed that 10 people <br />were at the meeting to address the issue and asked for consideration by the applicant to <br />amend original proposal The applicant was informed to notify Staff if unable to attend <br />so the announcement can be made to inform those in attendance. Dillerud apologized for <br />the misunderstanding He said he was not informed about the meeting and has taken <br />steps to ensure it would not happen in the future. <br />Hurr moved. Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution #3593. Ayes 5. .Nays 0. <br />t <br />i
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.