My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1995
>
09-11-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 12:48:21 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 12:43:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MDIUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 28,1995 <br />(#5 - #2036 Robert J. Gounumis - Continued) <br />Hurr asked how much room there was to back up in the driveway area. The applicant <br />leaiH there was approximately 23*. Gerhardson said at least 20' is required in order for a <br />car to successfully back out. <br />Hurr reiterated she was uncomfortable with the large size of the home as proposed It is <br />her suggestion the applicant reduce the number of bedrooms to two and add the tuck <br />under garage. The applicant noted the importance of having a bedroom on the first floor. <br />Hurr S2ud the applicant purchased the lot and the hardship should not be on the City <br />noting the number of variances being requested. The applicant said if he was unable to <br />build as proposed, he would be better off patching up the residence where it now stands. <br />Callahan again noted a change in the garage location and the amount of hardcover <br />produced by a turnaround. Mabusth said the location on the curve with backing up onto <br />the curve adds another dimension to the safety issue. Callahan said he preferred the <br />reverse of the driveway as proposed. <br />Callahan asked who had drawn the plans. Gountanis said the conceptual sketches had <br />been done on computer. Callahan was informed that Gountanis was an engineer by trade. <br />Callahan moved to approve Application #2036 per the Planning Commission <br />recommendations There was no second to the motion, <br />Ann Stevens suggested moving the house forward and taking the garage apron out. The <br />house as it presently lays creates a large look to it By moving it forward, the house <br />would begin lower and look less massive. Callahan said by moving the mass ot the <br />garage away fi'om the comer, it would enable people to see around and across it. <br />Goenen asked how much closer to the lake would the house have to be moved and <br />questioned the ability to move it forward. <br />Hurr said the purpose of the tear dowm should be to correct problems Hurr noted the <br />DNR also commented on the structure being too large for the lot. She telt this was the <br />time to consider afresh and make the necessary improvements. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.