08-28-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Request for Council Action continued page 3 August 2. 1995 Zoning FUc #2036 Brief Description of !lequest Counciln^mbers arc encouraged to review the staff memo enclosed dated July 7. 1995 and the Planning Commission minutes of the July 17. 1995 meeting for more background and detail on this rcvicw. Of the three improvement options tor the redevelopment of this property, the Planning Commission opted for Case 3 which involved the relocation of a new structure away from the lake at the approximate size of the existing structure. The single detached garage would now be an attached two-stall garage approved by the Planning Commission at 22’ x 22 (original 24’ x 22’). The current single-stall garage has an access door that faces th'' street. The proposed attached garage would now have side loading doors. The expanded driv'c area and enlarged garage result in excessive increases m hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area. Side setbacks arc improved with the Case 3 proposal. There will be no encroachment of an average lakeshorc setback line. Structural coverage is under the allowed 1,500 s.f. Hardcover in the 0-75’ setback area has decreased from 25% to 20.5%. Hardcover in the 75-250’ setback area increases from 11% to 65.9%. Note the intensity of the increase results from the limited area within the 75-250’ setback zone at 1,464 s.t. The Planning Commission opined that Cases 1 and 2 involving either partial or total repair of the existing foundation was a "band aid" approach to improvement of the property. Members noted that leaving the property for seasonal use would not solve any problems as the property would remain an eyesore. In fact, the adjacent neighbor to the immediate north was present to support the improvement of the property. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the improvement plan that would involve the reconstruction of a new two-stcry principal structure at a 38.5' x 26.2 footprint. Note this approval will allow squaring off of comers at the lakeside allowing a 3’ x 8' expansion from the original footprint at bo^ the northeast and southeast comers of the struemre. The Planning Commission would not approve the squaring off of the comers of structure in its present location. Ine Planning Commission also approved a 22’ x 22’ single- story attached garage to be located a minimum of 3’ from the right side yard adjacent to the public access and held structural coverage to the maximum allowed amount of 1.500 s.t. '^e enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To deny, adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution.