My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
08-28-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 12:17:43 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 12:14:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCtt ACTION <br />DATE: August 2, 1995 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Jeanne A. M^justb <br />Title Buildiof Sl Zoning Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoninis; <br />Item Description: #2036 Robert Gountanis. 1098 Loma Linda Avenue - Variances <br />Resolution <br />Zoning District: LR-IB <br />Total lot area = 6,812 s.f. <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />The following are the variances as amended per the directives of the Planning <br />Commission recommendation. Four of the six member Commission in attendance voted <br />unanimously to approve Option fer the redevelopment of the substandard parcel. <br />Councilmembers are encouraged to •'Tview the enclosed staff memo dated July 7, 1995 tor <br />greater detail on the three options of t rvelopment presented by the applicant. <br />1.Section 10.03. Subdivision 14 (C) - Review of strucmral coverage <br />Allowed = 1.500 s.f. <br />Existing = 1,284.8 s.f. <br />Case 3 original proposal =» 1,541.5 s.f. <br />Case 3 amended proposal = 1,492.7 s.f. <br />No variance required. <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) - Lakeshore setback. <br />Required = 75 ’ <br />Steps <br />Principal stnicture <br />Garage <br />Existing <br />IT <br />23 ’ <br />60 ’ <br />Case 3 Proposed <br />33’ <br />30’ <br />63 ’ 6" <br />Variance = 45’ or 60% <br />3.Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) <br />Allowed = 0 <br />Existing = 8 ’ <br />Case 3 proposed = 0 <br />No variance required. <br />- Average lakeshore setback
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.