Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File n036 <br />July 7, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br />Proposed garage. What is a reasonable size for the detached garage and <br />will you approve the existing 5.4 ’ street setback as long as doc*rs face <br />away from street? .... What is a reasonable right side setback from the <br />public access and still allow enough room for a side door loading garage? <br />Note the majority of the strucmral improvements would be located within <br />the 0-75 ’ setback area. Should garage be relocated to the northwest side <br />yard? <br />B. What level of structural improvements would you approve? <br />• Replacement of partial foundation, complete foundation or total <br />rebuild. <br />C. If foundation is replaced or structure relocated, would you limit second <br />story expansions above principal structure? <br />D. Would you allow a second story expansion above the garage if attached <br />to residence? <br />Options of Action <br />1. <br />3. <br />Approval. If members feel applicant has provided enough information so that a <br />plan can be amended per Planning Commission’s direction for Council’s review, <br />then you may act on this application, or <br />2. Table. Planning Commission may wish to review the amended proposal before <br />passing it onto Council for formal action; or <br />Denial. Members should refer to Section 10.08. Subdivision 3 (A) (1-12) for <br />necessary findings to be addressed if a variance application is to be recommended <br />for denial. Members may find the unique history of this property and the way <br />propeny has been used in recent years that the property can no longer be <br />upgraded to a year-round residence but can continue to serve for seasonal <br />recreational use. <br />Isv