Laserfiche WebLink
f- <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETLNG HELD ON JULY 24,1995 <br />(#6 - Mary & Gene Zulk - Continued) <br />Mabu^h reported that the i^>plication is for a 10x26* covered deck addition to the street <br />side of the residence. No setback variances are required. There is an increases in lot <br />coverage and 48 s f. of additional hardcover. 175 s f. of stone patio will be removed. <br />The Planning Commission said they did not wish to see applications unless additional <br />hardcover is removed. Mabusth said the improvement is the least amount to make the <br />best use of the lot. The allowed structural coverage is 15 “ o, or 1711 s.t. and exists at <br />17.6 and proposed at 19.9^i Mabusth confirmed that the increase in hardcover results <br />from a structural improvement, while the removal ot stone patio is not structural <br />hardcover. <br />Callahan said several recent applications address this issue of exceeding the lot coverage <br />and hardcover limits. According to the code, Callahan said a real hardship must be <br />demonstrated in order to exceed the allowable structural coverage, adding that <br />eliminating flower beds to enable additional structure does not fit the comprehensive <br />plan's intent. The non-structural should have no bearing on structural Callahan asked <br />that Staff and the Planning Commission to adhere to the poliev’. <br />Mabusth said the Planning Commission does look at reducing hardcover. In this case, <br />the commission knew they were dealing with a substandard lot and looked at where <br />removal could be accomplished. <br />Hurr said if the deck were reduced in width to 8' instead of the 10' requested, this would <br />satisfy the hard.ship and enable the applicant to still receive what they desire, and would <br />result in no gain of hardcover <br />The applicant said he would prefer the 10' width adding that the lot is small, and he lias <br />been unable to obtain any additional land. The neighbors are said to be aware of the <br />project as well as supportive of it. Zulk said the addition fits the house and the <br />neighborhood and will allow safe access to two doors. An elderly relative is li\ ing at the <br />home Zulk commented that the Planning Commission had said no more hardcover <br />would be allowed on the property without existing structure removed, and he has no <br />intention of doing so. <br />Hurr said the safety issue does not relate to the porch itself It was also added that the <br />applicant was aware of the substandard size of the lot w hen he purchased the propeny. <br />Hurr said a hardship would be not to have access that was sale. Kelley added that this <br />still docs not speak to the Issues brought up by Mayor Callahan. If the structural <br />hardcover is allowed, the hardcover would still be over the limits even if reduced <br />I