My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
08-14-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 12:01:09 PM
Creation date
10/6/2023 11:57:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGUXAR ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 13, 1995 QR <br />(#4 - Consideration of Land Or Money for Park Dedication Fund - Continued) <br />Park Commissioners discussed a possible trail along Fox Street. McMillan said the area is <br />verv close to the Luce Line, parallels it, and would duplicate it. McMillan did not see the <br />ne«i for a trail here. Flint responded that this goes to the nature of any traU which would <br />be provided along Fox Street. If the Commissions purpose is to build oniy major anenes, <br />then he agreed with McMillan. If the purpose is to provide smaller trails, then he did not. <br />The park plan contemplates both t>"pes of trails. <br />The Commission speculated on whether ftirther expansion of Fox Street or ^\atertown <br />Road would occur and how this would affect trails and where they are placed, an <br />whether separated or near a road. Wilson said serious bikers do not travel on Luce Line <br />as it is not built for high speeds These bikers use the roads Wilson also commented that <br />there is aood east-west route for bikers. It was noted that CoRd 6 has a narrow shoulder. <br />Flim coiranemed if anv work were to be done on CoRd 6, it would appropriate to ask tor <br />a separated trail. Wte commented on the difficulty of accessing the Luce Lme between <br />Willow Drive and Brown Road since the road is high and the trail is low at that point. <br />FUnt commented that the Commission needs to refine its trail plan to decide on which side <br />of the road a future trail mav be built. Now is the time to decide this with respect to Fox <br />Street. Flim cited the example of Old Crystal Bay Road trail. The utilities were on the ^ <br />west side Placement of housing is also another criteria. If they are placed to the rear of <br />properties away from the road, this is a good indicator for a trail, rather than homes close <br />to the roads. Flint said each project will be different and never ltXy?'o one way Flint <br />commented that with respect to this portion of Fox Street, the utilities poles as w ell as the <br />homes near the street were on the soutli side of Fox Sueet wliich would make the north <br />side the best choice if a trail w ere to be considered He pointed out that we w ere not now <br />deciding whether to build the trail, but merely on which side to "bank" an easement m case <br />a trail is decided upon at some future time. <br />MaMillan cited the Brown Road trail She is concerned with all the efforts taken to gain <br />small parcels ofland for trail segrnems Brown involved little cost, no easements, and no <br />citizen complaints McMillan felt this was a good way to approach this idea of trails. <br />Flint said this only works when major road construction is being done. McMillan felt it is <br />necessary to piggyback onto these major developments after seeing how dificult it has <br />been to obtain the trail on Old Cry stal Bay Road.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.