Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File /!'2034 <br />July 10, 1995 <br />Page 2 <br />I - Hardcover Inventory 75*250’ Setback Area <br />Jl-2 - Survey/Site Plan <br />K - Floor Plan <br />L - Elevation <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants propose a I0’x26.3 ’ covered deck addition to the street side of the residence. The <br />proposed structure will require no setback variances nor is there an encroachment ot an average <br />lakeshore setback line. The proposed addition will involve 263 s.f. or 2.3% increase in <br />structural coverage where 17.6% exists and only 15% is allowed. <br />The improvements result in a 213 s.f. or 2.64% increase in hardcover within the 75-250’ setback <br />area existing at 49.2% and proposed now at 51.8%. <br />Statement of Hardships <br />Refer to Exhibit F, applicants note the following: <br />1. Refer to Exhibit D. applicants note that lots on either side of property are double <br />in area. Prop d structural improvement would have no impact on the adjacent <br />residential properties. Review Exhibits Hl-2, adjacent property owners have <br />submitted letters in support of improvement plan. <br />2. There is no adjacent land available to acquire. <br />3.The propeny is smaller in area than the surrounding lakeshore lots on Cherry <br />Place. Once again refer to Exhibit D. note the majority of surrounding parcels <br />arc made up of two lots that are legally combined as a building site. <br />4. Existing access to residence is inadequate and unsafe. <br />5.An older member of the applicants ’ extended family requires a safer and easier <br />method to access structure than what exists today. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.Are there existing or proposed improvements that can be reduced in size? Can <br />stone patio area at northeast side of residence be either removed or reduced in <br />area, existing at 175 s.f. or 2 2%? What other improvements can be considered <br />for removal or reduction?