Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA <br />Notes to Financial Statements (continued) <br />December 31. 1994 <br />NOTE 8 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (CONTINUED) <br />Actuarial assumptions used in the calculation of the PEPFF include; (a) a rate of return on the <br />investment of present and future assets of 8.5% per year, compounded annually, prior to <br />retirement, and 5.0% per year, compounded annually, following retirement; (b) projected salary <br />increases of 6.5% per year, compounded annually, attributable to the effects of inflation; (c) post­ <br />retirement increa.ses that are accounted for by the 5.0% rate of return assumption following <br />retirement; and (d) mortality rates based on the 1971 Group Annuity Mortality Table projected <br />to 1984 for males and females. <br />2.Changes In Plan Provisions <br />The 1994 legislative session did not include any benefit improvements which would impact <br />funding costs for the PERF and the PEPFF. <br />3.Changes in Actuarial Assumptions <br />Prior to fiscal year 1994. the salary increase assumption and the mortality tables used in the <br />calculation of the pension benefit obligation for the PERF were the same as tho.se specified for <br />the PEPFF. For the July 1. 1994 actuarial valuation. PERA's Board of Trustees approved new <br />mortality rates updated to the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table, salary increases which were <br />changed to a select and ultimate table, and a new payrvdl growth assumption which was changed <br />from 6.5% to 6.0%. These changes were made ti> reflect actual experience of the plan. <br />With the adoption of the actuarial assumption changes and the new mortality tables for the PERF, <br />the pension benefit obligation increased by S56.596.000. The actuarial a.ssurnption changes also <br />necessitated an $81 .201 .000 transfer from the PERF Benefit Reserve to the PERF Minnesena Post <br />Retirement Investment Fund (MPRIF) Reserve to finance the increased obligation for future <br />retirement benefits. The change m the mortality rate assumption increased the PERF’s co.sts <br />because pensioners are living longer than assumed previously. The change in the salary increase <br />assumption, however, off set .some of the additional costs becau.se lower salary increases generally <br />translate into lower benefit liabilities in the future. <br />Potential changes in the assumptions used for the PEPFF may be made in the future after <br />completion of a special experience study for that fund. Completion of the PEPFF experience <br />study is expected by February I. 1995. <br />I -50-