My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
07-10-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 11:18:52 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 11:11:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r -pii™ <br />- <br />^ - <br />i-^ <br />4 The existing easement driveway that intersects proposed Lot 2 will not violate <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (B) as there is 2.15 dry contiguous acres to the west <br />of the easement driveway. <br />5 In the granting of approval of the Beau Marais plat in 1986 the City also granted <br />variances that allowed the filling of designated wetlands for the installation of the <br />driveway to serve the most northern lot or Lot 1 of the Beau Marais plat. <br />6 If a private road with cul-de-sac was installed along the east side of property to <br />serve all three lots, a half acre of designated wetlands would be filled. This <br />improvement would also result in the loss of several mature evergreen trees along <br />the east side of the property. All three access drives leading from road would <br />also encroach upon the designated wetland areas. <br />7 The current subdivision is defined as back lol/front lot subdivision requiring <br />shared access via a 30 ’ driveway outlet. The driveway outlet along the east <br />would be limited to only two users. Lot 2 of the original Beau Marais plat would <br />continue to gain access via the existing easement drive. Construction of a drive <br />would result in the loss of some of the mature evergreen trees planted along the <br />east property line. There would be an encroachment of the required 26’ setback <br />from the wetland. There would be additional encroachments of the designated <br />wetland for the fumre drive to ser\e both lx)ts I and 2 of the current subdivision. <br />8.The Planning Commission found the creation ol two driveways within this <br />property would have a negative impact upon the aesthetics and sensitive <br />environment of this unique property. <br />9 The current owner of Lot 2, Beau Marais, has agreed to maintain the current <br />looped driveway within their property to ser\e as a mmaround for emergency <br />vehicles. <br />10.There is no record of problems reported by the former owners of Lots 1 and 2, <br />Beau Marais or the current owners of l^t 2 in the use ot the current driveway <br />nor has the City any record of an accident resulting at the intersection ot the <br />private driveway and Fox Street. <br />Pace 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.