My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-10-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1995
>
07-10-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 11:18:52 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 11:11:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26,1995 <br />(#9 - Sewer - Continued) <br />Staff would like to apply to the Met Council for future sewer projects. Jabbour <br />suggested scheduling all possible projects for completion within the five year time span <br />allowed by MUSA, knowing that they would not necessarily come to be in that time <br />frame. If the Council agreed with the drafted letters and the proposed meeting dates, <br />Gaffron would proceed to send out the letters <br />Goetten recommended proceeding. Jabbour agreed and suggested elaborating on <br />paragraph 3 of the North Long Lake letter unde-'’ "Why Are Municipal Sewers Being <br />Considered?". The letter speaks of 70% of exisun^ septic systems would need to be <br />upgraded. Jabbour felt the residents should be inlo*^ ^ .cd on what would prompt a failing <br />system, i.e. a new mortgage or selling of the propeny. in order not to duplicate a resident <br />from paying for a new system along with the cost ot sewering. Jabbour emphasized the <br />City’s desire to work with the residents on this issue. Jabbour also emphasized the <br />importance of residents knowing that, even if systems are not inspected, there are triggers <br />in place to cause a failing system to be upgraded. <br />Goetten asked that it be made clear about the 3' separation from the seasonal high water <br />table, and why a residence would need to ccme on line. It was decided that this would be <br />embellished upon at the meeting to clarify any misunderstandings. <br />Callahan agreed on the need to proceed. <br />Dates of meetings were discussed. Moorse will post the dates of the meetings and notify <br />Council. GaflS-on will send the mailings to the residents two weeks prior to a meeting. <br />MAYOR/COUNCEL REPORT <br />Jabbour informed members of the press to note the bill passed on the House floor <br />allowing the DNR to sell the land on Maxwell Bay. Jabbour asked Staff to e.vtend <br />gratitude to Representative Todd VanDellen and Senator Gen Olson for their efforts <br />regarding this bill. <br />Jabbour relayed information on the LMCD budget. The LMCD promised to bring <br />reserves to a 6-month operating level. The present budget does not reflect this promise, <br />and Jabbour said his concerns were dismissed when voiced. Jabbour said many do not <br />understand the purpose of the LMCD. It was noted that the surface management was <br />conducted by the Hennepin County Water Patrol, who are budgeted through the County. <br />Special event licensing and permits are also taken care of by Hennepin County, along <br />with the dredging of channels and placement of buoys.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.