Laserfiche WebLink
Policy # Description Priority Action Chapter/Bill #Comments <br />AMM Policy Report (1995) <br />IIIA-8,9 State/County Licensed Residen- <br />tial Facilities <br />D NoAction Policy Not <br />Upheld Policy calls for more input from cities in the <br />regulation of group homes. <br />IIIB-1 Cities Redevelop­ <br />ment & Economic <br />Development <br />B No <br />Action <br />Policy Not <br />Upheld <br />This policy suggests that a state development <br />strategy be established and that cities be the <br />primary governmental unit responsible for imple­ <br />menting the strategy. <br />IIIB-2 ReinstatelExpand <br />URAP <br />B No <br />Action <br />Policy Not <br />Upheld <br />The policy urges the Legislature to reinstate the <br />former successful Urban Revitalization Action <br />Program (URAP) and expand it to include <br />suburban cities. <br />lIlB-3 Equal Treatment <br />of Cities <br />C Upheld The AMM successfully opposed attempts in other <br />proposed TIF legislation that would have set <br />different requirements for usage of programs on <br />basis other than problem derinition. <br />IIIB-4, 5 Tax increment <br />Financing <br />B Partially <br />Upheld <br />Laws 1995, <br />Chapter 264 <br />(See TIF summary - p,6 in narrative) <br />lIIB-6 Other <br />Development Tools <br />B Partially <br />Upheld <br />Laws 1995, <br />Chapter 224 <br />Did not establish new tools for cities and appro­ <br />priated only $6 million for the economic recovery <br />grant programs. <br />IIIB-7 Development of <br />Polluted Lands <br />A Upheld Laws 1995, <br />Chapter 224 <br />and 255 <br />State appropriated $7.8 million for pollution <br />clean-up and the Livable Communities Act pro ­ <br />vides about $4,(X)0,000 more for clean-up.