My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
06-12-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 10:36:34 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 10:28:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V> <br />To:Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />^ ^ <br />From:Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:May 12, 1995 <br />Subject:Public Hearing - Domestic Abuse Shelter Ordinance Amendment - Thursday <br />May 18, 1995, 7:00 p.m. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Council Minutes 4/10/95 <br />B - Draft R-IA Conditional Use Permit <br />C - Draft B-4 Conditional Use Permit <br />D - Legal Aspects of Conditional Use Permit: <br />Statute <br />Excerpts from Malkerson Training Materials <br />Zoning Code Section 10.09 <br />On April 10, the City Council directed Planning Commission to hold a public hearing <br />for a proposed amendment to the Zonng Code to allow domestic abuse shelters. Council <br />directed staff to draft two options, to a.Tiend either the residential zomng distncts or the B-4 <br />district. Council noted that the Hessbergs would have to request a rezoning to commercial <br />(requiring a 4/5 majority vote) if the shelter use is placed in the B-4 district rather than the R- <br />lA. <br />Exhibits B and C are nearly identical draft ordinances for making domestic abuse shelters <br />a conditional use in the R-IA or B-4 zoning districts. Please remember that aU residential <br />zoning districts refer back to the R-IA conditional use standards, including the LR-IC district. <br />The required CUP conditions as drafted would functionally limit the shelter use to a very few <br />areas of the City, which staff will have mapped for the public hearing. <br />These drafts reflect an amalgamation of bits and pieces of regulation drawn from codes, <br />resolutions, etc. used in other cities, and many of these requirements have been discussed at our <br />work sessions. City Attorney Tom Barrett suggests two specific concerns with the drafts: <br />• We should articulate in the ordinance our rationale for many of the specific location <br />and site/huildin2 requirements ... i.e. why within 1,(X)0’ of a bus line... <br />• The operations section is precariously close to acting as a licensing function as <br />opposed to a zoning function, and the City may be ill-equipped to deal with the <br />potential issues with licensing such a facility. <br />Perhaps we need to limit our regulation to the impacts of it on the neighborhood, rather <br />than on how it operates ... You may see revised drafts by May 18...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.