My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
06-12-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 10:36:34 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 10:28:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CIT^' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 22, 1995 <br />(#9 - Hillside Place Administrative Appeal - Continued) <br />Jabbour responded that the City in good faith made the agreement based on access from <br />Hillside and sees no reason to readdress the issue less than six months after the ori^nal <br />agreement was made. <br />Goetten asked Gaffron to address the drainage issue. Gaffron said the drainage swale is <br />in the southeast comer The drainage issue was not addressed during the subdivision <br />aplication. Whether or not the driveway site was usable was not brought up as an issue <br />during the division The ov^,Tier requested to use Wallace Avenue for a driveway. Thw <br />Public Works Depanment procedurally made the decision to deny the Wallace Avenue <br />access for the property In 1908, Matson’s property was 1 lot, and Wallace did not exist. <br />In 191 1, there was a 4-lot subdivision, and a 20 ’ corridor called Wallace Avenue was <br />taken for a right-of-way to serve those 4 lots since they needed to abut a road. Gaffron <br />noted that if thete is no public purpose served by Wallace, Wallace Avenue could be <br />vacated, and the property would revert solely to the Matson's. <br />Gerhardson said that he has not looked at the drainage for the lot. Callahan asked if a <br />driveway can be constructed over the drainage ditch. Cook said a culvert could be <br />installed to make it workable. <br />Pasch commented that the applicant asked about the change during the application <br />process and was told it was a public works decision <br />Callahan moved, Goetten seconded, to accept the Staff recommendation and denied the <br />appeal. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#10) OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD BIKE TRAIL <br />Moorse reported that #10 and #11 are related items but #10 is to update the Council on <br />the status of the Old Crystal Bay Road bike trail. The Council had approved the plws <br />and specifications and advertised for bids for the major portion of the construction in <br />1995. Hennepin Parks, who is to be in a joint venture and funding agreement with the <br />City, has recently shown their concern over the Hwy 12 corridor and the impact on the <br />Baker Park trail. Mn/DOT had involved Hennepin Parks in the CoRd 6 and Hwy 12 <br />interchange. Hennepin Parks see a potential impact, while the Engineer designed the <br />interchange so it should not impact the park. Hennepin Parks is uncomfortable with this <br />summation and feels there are issues to be resolved. Hennepin Parks is not willing to <br />proceed at this time. Moorse said some grant funds are available in 1995. St^ <br />recommends the tw o segments of the trail be completed this year, and the major portion <br />be reserved until 1996. Matching funds from the grant application are available through <br />the DNR.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.