Laserfiche WebLink
& <br />■ AWc frnctration with the Icnizth of time it has taken to come to anyMr Johnson voiced his frustration wiui u« ^ <br />decision over .be vacauon of .he righ.-of.w.y. He r=..e«.ed how .he easemen. and <br />vaca.ion are ™ o separa.e issues, Johnson feels .ha. Nelson ,s enmled .o .he use of .he <br />road bu. no. enu.led .o bo.h accesses .hrough .he aUey and .hrough .he lakes.de. He sa.d <br />i. e.,u r,f nrnoenies in the area because of the right-of-\^-ay there has been an impact on the sale of properties <br />issue. <br />NU Nelson read a prepared s.a.en.cn. of his objedon .o .he vaca.ion of Fores. <br />Boulevard-, as .he lakeside r,gh.-of.way was once caded. His opinion is .ha. he would <br />be landlocked if .he vaca.ion is pemu..ed, Orono had vaca.ed all of dus lakes.de road <br />excep. .ha. portion in from of .he properties owned by Johnson and Nelson If U.e C.ty <br />vacated .ha. par, located in front of the Johnson property. Nelson feels he would be left <br />on his own to solve his iccess problem. <br />Johnson was asked by Callahan if he was willing .0 give U.e easenren. to Nelson, which <br />he responded he would. Barren said .ha. .he locauon of U.e prescriptive easenten. may <br />no. be .he ideal way .0 ge. from .he house to the road and asked Johnson if he would be <br />w.lling .0 gran, an easem.n. to an alternate route, Jotorson said he was no. willing .0 do <br />this. <br />CaUahan aareed .ha. .he City needs ,o provide access for .he Nelson's. Barren <br />concurred; drouglv he believes Nelson would have legal access .hrough prescript.on, I. <br />discussed .ha. if Johnson gave prescriptive easemen. to Nelson and .be aaion was <br />uncon.es.ed in coun. fr.e cos. would be about S2.000. The Council would then take <br />was