Laserfiche WebLink
ORC.;0 PARK COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 4, 1995 draft <br />(Discussion of Pro <br />Continued) <br />^osed Deve*ccu»ent ne^iar French Creek Preserve - <br />White asked fcr a r.cticn. <br />Motion 1. To reccr.r.e <br />to have a house bui_ <br />added to the French <br />end to -he C'tv thar lZ it at all possible not <br />Ireek"preser'/eT I*sle moved, Wilson seconded. <br />that this lot be acquired and <br />, . . - ,-1-^cation on the first motion, in the event <br />Me-amec as.<ea “i^^couire the orooerty on the east side ofTity or t.i._ — aCu_- . - __pg^g*. q£ I assuming <br />Che wetland whcch ^is in'che other three lots <br />cnac tne qnescxon cccterate with Che City io try to <br />wcuia 4.0C . -- - house on Lot 4, and let the City <br />figure ® I still be looking at a park land <br />delication L"fi?'ihe fi^st three lots, or will that have been met <br />by donating Lot 4. <br />^axiLmTand that w7 arJ <br />SO there is no authority that we can take park lana. <br />so you take what you can take, and then buy what you can't take <br />asked Melamed. <br />Flint agreed. The vote on the motion was. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Motion 2, do we want to Cake land or money? <br />White moved to cake land, McMillan seconded. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />park; or part on the east siae and part on the west. <br />!iS Js:TS'r.»JS:Of v-ew fraamenting the corridor. Taking a <br />S^^ou?dnike'oi^..^nt thTjt^Sjr.e%o <br />buffe-^^steS^^doesn'Twork^wel an envirLmental <br />r hncrtJt \i°a^ceft ^^InotL^? w^ffie ^a^re*^Vn1lA‘o°m^lfeAt <br />?Sgether. "hft ?s why the best idea is not to build on Lot 4.