My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
05-08-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 9:51:10 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 9:48:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORCNO PARK COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR APRIL 4, 1995 <br />drah <br />(Discussion of Proposed Development near French Creek Preserve <br />Continued) <br />if the orooertv we will forever lose that option. m terms of our <br />own planninc I can show you where the City conceptually <br />acoroved a bike trail. There is one aown Ola Crystal Bay Roac. <br />Construction along the south portion from uhe ^Luce Line to <br />Norenberg has not been a high priority. We coulan >. even put one <br />in f^ont of your house because we don't have an easement. If you <br />sometime divided your orcperty in the future, we_could ask for an <br />element at that ?ime,*but we just can't put a oi.<e trail on your <br />property without your consent. <br />He said what the Commission would be addressing later on is the <br />question of whether it should take 15' less on the east, in order <br />to be able to take 15' on the west for a possible future bike <br />trail. <br />an extremely <br />Melamed give <br />wooded these <br />the City was <br />of the plat <br />Mrs. Must, felt that if we take Plan B, this is <br />heavily wooded piece of property, and if we don't make <br />the buffer zone around the outside, it is so heavily <br />people are going to be protected anyhow. She thought <br />better off taking a chunk of land on the east side <br />because the buffer zone is already there. <br />Melamed stated as long as the buffer zone is going to be there on <br />the west anyway the trees are going to stay. <br />Flint stated, as Mabusth was saying that will have to be imposed as <br />a condition of not putting a central road in there. The buffer <br />zone area shown on Plan A on the north, west and south will be <br />there anyway. <br />Melamed questioned suggested maybe the answer was to have a 50 <br />buffer on the east side and have an engineer measure whatever is <br />left over and use it all along Old Crystal Bay Road, so you have <br />both buffer zone areas. If you do it by Park Dedication the only <br />buffer zone you will have is on the north between us and Art Ellis <br />and the property lot lines. <br />Flint stated that from the standpoint of the Park Commission there <br />wer» three matters to consider: _ <br />” 1. If we want to make a recommendation to the City Council <br />with respect to the development of Lot 4. <br />2. Do we want to take land or money. <br />3 . Do we want to reduce the amount we are Caking on the east <br />side in order to take some area for a bike trail on the west. <br />Wilson, agreed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.