05-08-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FOR APRIL 4/ 199 j (Discussion of proposed Development near Frenoh Creek Preserve - Continued) soent Dublic money to set aside the fe^ t this the City did not have many opportunities to ^ ®ith was a key issue for the ?ar.< Commission .o deal witn. Flint asked if some of the neighbors had any input to orrer. Mike Ell’S of 1020 Old Crystal Bay Road South, statea Plan A einoo' ^ an c-rc«^’'ed about maintaining tnings as much as made sense. " we-e, I realize they can't stay that possible as to the ^ay the road. I was one ofbut one Question is accut pav.-ng i*.u^ several who went back if"^tVse°t^eJs^are\aintained the any difference with the pond. Sirs sr ".s“ .* Wilson questioned, so your adding 50'. Melamed stated its 50' plus 40' that the City already owns. Flint said that if we go with Plan B, which is to take the land, tir Planning Commission may require that you still provide a buffer. Mabusch, felt Che Planning Commission would require building a barrier/buffer along the boundaries or the property. You can assume the other buffers are going to happen, stated Melamed. Flint indicated that it might be possible to Provide * nf all three - some land to be donated, some casement to buffer t property Ind some money Co be contributed. He asked what would be the maximum land if that were all. Melamed indicated that the calculations Chat Gronberg came «P «ith are 1 23+ acres, which the Park Commission was entitled, 1-2 acres was dr^ an^the other .03 is wetland. This asssumed a corridor 95 to 100' along the east side of the property. Wilson stated that the Nature Conservation does a of conservation easements so she had talked to them. ^atiire Conservancy said the problem with the conservation they need a lot of monitoring, you need to have some one ^hec 9 ^ and make sure they are being followed and as a general prsct?ce that ts a real hasLl. Their advice was for the City to