Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />A. Total lot area is 62,660 s.f. but only 19.210 s.f. lies within the 75-250’ <br />setback area. <br />B. A standard lakeshore lot with 62.660 s.f. in area would have yielded much <br />hieher hardcover allowances within the 75-250’ setback zone. <br />C. <br />D. <br />E. <br />The property is located on a pensinsula. <br />The property contains unique topographic constraints <br />The house has been designed to limit horizontal expansion utilizing the <br />building footprint to provide additional outdoor recreational space. <br />F.Surface runoff from 20% -I- of the total 29.2% of hardcover improvements <br />will be heated within a drainfield area and will not run directly into lak;. <br />G.The major portions of the roof strucmre will meet the allowed 30’ legal <br />height. A small obervation tower located within the central portion of the <br />building will be at a 35’ height. <br />H. The majority of the structure will be located beneath the tree line of the <br />property. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other propertv in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substanfial proi^ity <br />right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />Page 2 of 5