Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 2 <br />April 28, 1995 <br />Zoning File #2011 <br />Neighbors in attendance at the hearing noted concern with the location of a future dock to serve <br />the property and any potential impact on the existing trees. Applicants advised that they would <br />not be placing their dock at the south shoreline because of the location of the wetlands but would <br />locate the dock at the higher elevations along the east shoreline. Applicants advised the <br />neighbors that they too were concerned with any removal ot trees and have specifically placed <br />the house to preserve as many of the mature trees. In fact, it is their intention to plant many <br />more trees at the time of the development of a final landscape plan. Applicants were advised <br />of the need for permits from the City if trees were to be removed in the 0-75’ setback area. <br />Six of the seven member Commission voted to approve the application as proposed adopting the <br />unique findings and hardships set fonh in applicants’ addendum and as noted in the original <br />variance resolution of 1993. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings <br />and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. Staff has added an additional <br />condition dealing with the placement of a future dock at the east shoreline rather than allowing <br />the encroachment of the wetlands along the extensive southern shoreline. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: <br />To approve, deny or amend the enclosed approval resolution <br />V