My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
05-08-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 9:51:10 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 9:48:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9 « <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 8 5 0 7____ <br />j. <br />4. <br />5. <br />A. <br />The property consists of 14,140 s.f. or .32 acres. <br />Three members of the Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />November 21. 1994. and recommended unanimous approval of the variances as <br />proposed based upon the following findings: <br />The lots in the Concordia neighborhood were developed prior to zoning <br />standards for residential development of lake shore propenies. <br />B. Two-thirds of the residence structure is located within the lake shore <br />protected area. <br />C. The proposed second story expansion will not result in an increase in <br />hardcover. <br />D. The lake shore view windows of the adjacent residences will not be <br />negatively impacted by the second story addition. <br />E. The homes on either side have partial second stories. <br />F The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors who <br />would receive the most impact from the unprovement; The City has been <br />contacted by adjacent neighbors supporting the proposal. <br />G. The lot is 50’ in width and the existing footprint of the residence stnicture <br />is 20’. The structure conforms to the required side setbacks. <br />H. The improvement would be consistent with current improvements on <br />adjacent properties. <br />I. The proposed improvement would not have a detrimental impact on the <br />values of the surrounding residences. <br />The City CouncU rmds that the conditions existing on this propetty ^ <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />rwrnvm MOw
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.