Laserfiche WebLink
I- <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE C.TT COUNCIL <br />NO 8 50? <br />•* I*' <br />J. <br />4. <br />OAJ^y 3 y <br />Va jS'L <br />oesfte^se/^^ <br />The property consists of 14.140 s.f. or .32 acres. <br />Three members of the Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br />November 21. 1994. and recommended unanimous approval of the variances as <br />proposed based upon the following fmdings: <br />A. The lets in ihe Ccnccrdia neighborhood were developed prior to zoning <br />standards for residential development of lake shore propenies. <br />B. <br />C. <br />135S> lfAP/<r D. <br />Two-thirds of the residence structure is located within the lake shore <br />protected area. <br />The proposed second stoiy expansion will not result in an increase in <br />hardcover. <br />The lake shore view windows of the adjacent residences will not be <br />negatively impacted by the second story addition. <br />E. The homes on either side have partial second stories, <br />RsfeftAfB p- <br />lotrH !o‘ stOB <br />vies <br />5. <br />The City has received no negative comments from the neighbors who <br />would receive the most impact from the improvement. The Citv has been <br />contacted by adjacent neighbors supporting the proposal. <br />The lot is 50’ in width and the existing footprint of the residence struemre <br />is 20’. The stmeture conforms to the required side setbacks. <br />The improvement would be consistent with current improvements on <br />adjacent properties. <br />The proposed improvement would not have a detrimental impact on the <br />values of th*: surrounding residences. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other propert>' in this zonmg district, at <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />H. <br />I. <br />Page 2 of 5