My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
04-10-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 9:07:55 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 9:05:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File 1^^2003 <br />March 13, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />Upon stafFs recent inspection, additional hardcover areas were found at street side ot residence, <br />review Exhibit H. Approximately 282 s.f. of additional landscape areas underlain with plastic <br />were found. Adjusted hardcover 'within 75-250' is now at 8,291 s.f. or 33.6%. Applicants will <br />probably agree to remove the plastic underliner. In early discussions with applicants, staff <br />advised that based on topoeraphv and drainage patterns for property', the removal of plastic may <br />result in Hooding problem's wit'hin lower tloor. The applicants were advised to consult with <br />contractor. Upon your site inspection, note signs of flooding problem in lower floor at lakeside. <br />Currently the only outdoor sitting area is the patio (233 s.f.) at the southwest side to the lakeside <br />of the residence. There is an extensive deck system to the lakeside of the residence to the west. <br />The owner was granted an average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances in 1987 for the <br />deck. Upon your site inspection try to determine the degree of visual impact by the proposed <br />new construction upon the residences to the east and to the west. <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Review Exhibit Al. applicants’ hardship statement. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Will there be a negative impact upon the lakeshore views of the residences to the east or <br />west? If so. which of the strucnires would have the most impact? Are there ways that <br />the improvements could be installed to minimize the visual impact, refer to G-1 and H-2? <br />What of the topography at the lakeside and existing plantings? <br />2 Proposed improvements consist of 712 s.f. or 2.8% of structural improvements and 340 <br />s.f. (grade level patio) or 1.4% of nonstructural in exchange for the removal of 1,184 <br />s.f. or 4.8% nonstructural hardcorer improvements. Once again the code provides no <br />direction on nonstructural versus strucr..ral. The only code section that deals with <br />strucniral considerations is the strucmral coverage code and it does not apply for a lot <br />in excess of 1.99 acres. <br />3. Are additional hardcover removals necessary ? 282 s.f.± additional hardcover has been <br />found. <br />4. How do existing flood problems of residence impact your review of accessory structure <br />adduions to lakeside of residence? <br />5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.