04-10-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ronald Moorse February 9,1995 Page 2 3. The projected number of RECs (residential equivalent connections) at present and for the years 2000 and 2010. t/ 4. Projected increases in sewered RECs and population for each of the next five years. ^ R Th® projected wastewater flows in the years 2000 and 2010 for the entire city and the S Jndivjdual interceptor service areas. Include a description as to how the flows were calcu including the per capita design flows. calculated ' 6. A description and summary of the reasons for on-site s>stem failure or potential failure for A ^ ) each area to be served. The information for the city of Forest Lake that was previously sent you indicates the type of information needed. 7 7. Consideration given to alternative means of service to these areas, eg. community drainfields. ^ 8. Description of how service will be provided and points of connection to existing sewers. ^ '9- Capacity and design flows for lateral and trunk sewers as well as new lift stations. ) O 10, Sewer construction timetable. 11. Method of assessment. Has any of the proposed area already been assessed? IZ'A 12.*’^) ^2. Summary of city’s adopted objectives, policies and strategies for preventing and reducing ’ excessive infiltration and inflow in the local sanitary sewer s>-stem including standards for new |2'C ^ 12--^ sj-stems and programs for identi^ing and reducing excessive L7. The city should have an ordinance prohibiting the connection of roof drains and sump pum[)S to the sanitary sewer system. 13. Summary of the city’s requirements for on-site sewage disposal systems including installation, biennial inspection of all existing s>stems by certified personnel, permit record keeping, li^nsing, maintenance and remedial actions. The Council ’s policy is that all systems be inspected biennialy by MPCA certified personnel. New systems must meet Minn. Regs. 7080. H 14. Council records indicate that the city has amended its comprehensive plan to incorporate the Council ’s Interim Strategy for the Reduction of Nonpoint Source Pollution and will amend its land use controls to implement the poliev by May, 1^5. Is the city on track to complete this task by May? 15. There are several city development policies of concern to the Council. These arc the city’s land use polices for future development, and city plans for handling/treatment of wastewater and transportation to serve this development. Also, the city’s plan for expanding life-cycle and affordable housing is a Council concern. The city’s current plan indicates that development in the area outside the MUSA is currently planned for 2-acrc lots served by on-site sanitary disposal sj-stems. Given the number of units, planned densities and local soil conditions, the Council is concerned about the pollution of