Laserfiche WebLink
NAVARRE LA]SE - SUBDIVISION <br />‘of A LO? Z^x‘^^NGE>ffiNT'- RESOLimON <br />Ur JL^v/ r ----------- <br />G.^on reponed .his is <br />,0,5 44^7 3.d sold 45. 46. 4.0 47.0 „,5,„ .he V2 aero and 100 <br />end is roquesrins to ««“Se ji.es. The SAC charges svnll be p^dand is requesting to ^earraf S« ^ sites. The SAC charges will be paid. <br />There is no water avauablc to 3300 Navarre Lane, owned bySegnCT. <br />agreed to instaU a fence .0 ebn-anate access to i..e.e <br />41^1 4V-f <br />- ^ -;7 49 49 and 50, o^^Tied by Scgr»cr, <br />Gaf&on said .here is also^.e issue °^«;^';:^®,aclied for .;vice bo. rejected due .0 <br />..Vhich need .0 be ccntb.ned .0 ce sold T - ^ condition of thts <br />delinquent taxes a. those tunes. This is re-tea <br />lot line rearrangement.lOl nnc \ ----- <br />Gafiion said there is a minor ^han|e to^he in <br />format of the surxey for metes i^^^Xh is not needed by the county. T e <br />that each parcel has separate legJ •,„ lar.g-uage: A city approved <br />Ctv .Anomey requested the ^-ropeny owner to the other (a deed <br />conveyance of the residual P*"«B ho ^ ownership and any <br />e.xchange); and a title opuuon P;°^, h-neter drainage and utility easements <br />encumbrances matnly because we are _'Kin=. .0 p <br />for this rearrangement. <br />Sesmer replied to Callahan that she is satisfied with the reanangement. <br />Hum stated the need to add the condition that the five lots be combined at thds ..me. <br />nun ----- <br />r t’nn subdiN'ision of a Ici line reiursng^nient <br />Jabbour moved .0 approx •^PP'^“''°"bv Jacci Segner .0 combine lots #36. u7, <br />resolution pending the hung 0 t PP “ g motion. .Ayes 5. Nays 0. <br />43.49. and 50. Resolution #u466. Huir seconu <br />(#12) SEPTIC MORATORIUM UPD.ATEyrriJL) OX--* A