Laserfiche WebLink
(^7) #1990 ROBERT W. CARLSON, 710 GANDER ROAD - VACATION OF <br />easement - RESOLUTION #3538 <br />Goenen moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution «533 for Robert W. Carlson of <br />710 Gander Road for a vacation of easement. Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(UR\ "1992 JAaMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1420 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMTTA'ARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3539 <br />Gary Benson of Kraus Anderson Constmaion represented the applicants. <br />Mabusth reponed that this application is for hardcover variances in the 0-7 a variance <br />to aUow for^major repair of an oversized accessory super structure to include replacement <br />of the upper ponion of greenhouse with new aluminum and glass super ^ <br />repair of Lck foundation waUs, and setback variances tor stmctural repairs to the <br />accessory garage, and a conditional-use permit and 0-75 setback v-ari^ance ^e <br />“parent oh retaining waU at the entrance to the lower level of the greenhouse. <br />The accessorv struemre was formtUly recognized in October of 1993 » » <br />structure as U exceeds the allowed 3000 s.f in area for an ““““O' <br />fesults in any structural repairs requiting variance approvals. Major repairs to the thr«- <br />car garage iMiude new fascia, roof, insulated windows and d^rs and t^er details. Th <br />fpproval for structural repairs. Applicant has asked to add a <br />line in the 0.75' to the lakeside deck. The pathway was ongmally shown at 8 <br />constructed at 4' wide and adds 160 s.f of new hardcover. An existing <br />to be restored. The 160 s.f of walkway and 30 s.f of wall were not mcluded m <br />original hardcover facts. The original improvement plan showed a 12 iwde <br />It was shown as a grassed drive with an underlying gravel bed that wMid <br />considered hardcover. The Planning Commission found no acceptable har^lup to dlow <br />a new curb cut on the public roadway and 250 s.f of additional hardcover m ^ <br />setback area. An amended site plan shows the 10' drive being removed and <br />a grass lawn. It was noted that the 4' wide walkway and paved ar« are aftt^th^h^ <br />rMuests. The new curb cut should have required City approval. It was noted that there <br />is no need to go onto the neighbor's property to make the required repairs. <br />The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the application as <br />amended excluding the paved drive within the 0-75' setback area with ^ condihons. <br />The 10' wide paved drive within the 0.75' setback area must be removed OTd <br />groundcover restored no later than May 15, 1995. Applicant must provide <br />confirmation of a date when the new sepuc systems serving principal structure ana <br />detached caretaker residence are to be instaUed.