Laserfiche WebLink
i\NW <br />CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL <br />NO________________ <br />B. The expanded roof structure will not be visible from the lake. <br />C. Hardcover allowed on this propert)* is 35%. Hatdcover is at <br />approximately 14%. <br />D. Applicant has acquired additional lands doubling the area of the propert)’ <br />from .8 acres to 1.6 acres. <br />E. The City has received no negative cc.nmenis from the property owner to <br />the immediate south receiving the most impact with the expansion of the <br />roof line of the residence structure. <br />F. The footprint of the existing structure is 15 ’ from the side lot line and the <br />3 ’ eaves that extend southward are located 12 ’ from the side lot line. <br />4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />grantinc the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air not <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property ’; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br />ri2ht of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />bv the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS <br />Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council <br />hereby srants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit <br />structural expansi- . the roof where portions of the structure are located within a substandard <br />side yard requiring approval of an 18 ’ or 60% side setback variance, subject to the fol owmg <br />conditions: <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />ftm VXa 0>ii Of#'