My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-1995 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
03-27-1995 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2023 8:56:43 AM
Creation date
10/6/2023 8:55:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 13,1995 <br />(#12 - Sewer Connection - Continued) <br />Goetten voiced her concern with the need to hook up sewer for the house, but does not <br />want csbins to be connected. She does not wish for a precedent to be set and wants to <br />see that codes are met <br />Attorney Perlman reported he had discussed options with Mr. Weckman in 1994, and <br />later with Gaffron, who indicated he would contact the owners with additional options <br />The letter from Gaffron sent last month was the next communication with the City <br />according to Perlman. <br />Perlman said that the owners are willing to connect the house to sewer. The issue of the <br />cabins is their main concern as the cabins present a source of necessary income It is cost <br />prohibitive for the owners to connect both the cabins and house to sewer. Perlman said <br />the owners are asking for option #4 and are resolved to remove the cabins, but wish to <br />allow for a longer period of time before this occurred. The owners are willing to pay the <br />costs involved to connect the house to sewer, pay the SAC fees, and permit fee. <br />Kelley inquired of the current septic system. Gaffron said it had been added onto in 1980 <br />and does present problems with the current code. It is handling the use by the two cabins <br />at this time, but would need upgrading at the end of the stipulated two year period <br />allowed for upgrade of nonconforming systems. Council questioned whether the cabins <br />were legally, or illegally, non-conforming. Gaffron said, due to the proximity to the lake, <br />they were legally non-conforming as to location; but with no evidence in the files of any <br />Clip for rental use, that use is likely not considered a legal non-conformity. <br />The condition of the storage building on the site was said to be mediocre. The parking <br />for the cabin rentals was noted to be a blacktop area next to the main house. It was <br />noted that the survey was not current but found to be accurate. Gaffron said that an <br />updated survey was not needed for this request. T’^e owners were asked if they knew at <br />the time of purchase whether or not cabin rental was conforming. The applicants said <br />they hadn’t checked, but had thought so, since they were being rented at the time. <br />Hurt moved, Jabbour seconded, to require the sewer connection to the house within 90 <br />days; to permit rental of the cabins for such time as the code allows the septic system to <br />remain until it is required to be upgraded; upgrading the septic system will not be <br />allowed. The cabins must then be removed at that time. The owners are also required to <br />combine the three parcels into one tax parcel. An agreement between the owners and the <br />City will be drafted by the owners' attorney in conjunction with the City's attorney in <br />order to ensure the owners will abide by these conditions. Barrett noted that if the septic <br />system fails prior to the date allowed, the use of the septic system would have to be <br />abandoned and the time period ended. Ayes 5, Nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.