Laserfiche WebLink
em. ^ <br />virrARTY 245 TONKA AV-ENUE - V.ARIANCE - PUBLIC <br />(#10) #1927 \L\RY K. MCCARTx, <br />hearing <br />Chair Scbroeder noted that Schroeder noted <br />were on file with the City. Road, stated they had attempted <br />this w’as a public hearing. ao proposed de%elopment may adversely <br />to replat Parcels 1 and 2 ^e adequate distance from the applicant’s <br />impact their plans. He asked it ^icCarthv responded that she is required to <br />house and when they might build. . ^ done a good <br />meet the setback requirements for applicant has requested approval <br />'Se°i otr c^^^rp^n: bl^t :r bn. -o. .. b^n dr... <br />Chair Schroeder stated he felt Commission <br />;“mb°ers“noter‘’bit onCny renews forntnl’ plans ari not drafted because appheants are <br />only seeking direction from the Citv*. <br />It was moved by Rowlette. ^a^^ To^a Avenue because this <br />"m helprs:^"*^ s=nrne&d the lot is very shallour and to allow <br />fo; preservarion of extst.ne mature trees. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />(#U) #1928 SUZANNE K. WACKER, 1115 BROIVN ROAD SOITTH • RENEWAL <br />' V.ARLANCE • PUBLIC HEARING <br />Chair schroeder noted 1^f:::e‘:.^h';'“ <br />were on file with the City. Mabus.h f-etbacks <br />previous review the shed in the rear yar w removal She noted that the <br />and with the current proposal the new o'™",? ^{l vtructurt woe' i encroach <br />rSrt -o ^h?sueTset‘bXrfI aai7schr«der noted .bis was a public heanng, <br />but no one wisued to speak. <br />“ ^nc:°::i1anntK. w“c"’'l U5 Bt::n raTsrtrsub|:'’cr "be <br />shed in the rear yard prior to final inspection. Ayes 6, nays u. <br />(#12) #1929 ALONZO B. SERAN, III, 4099 HIGHWOOD RO.\D - VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />Gaffron reviewed the staff report and the was present and <br />hardcover variances, and discussed the nropertv from adjacent <br />stated that there is a significant amount of runoff P'/jsome tiling and <br />properties located upstream, but he felt that he could manage by