Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />• T V Has contciiri®*^ 3 SII15I0 <br />sewer unit. structures on more than 1 of <br />considered as principa City's interest if the <br />the parcels, it and plumbing removed from the <br />properties were i i^v that the property owner <br />Cabins. There is a multiple units if <br />would see a benefit in P y rearrangement to <br />that would guarantee current zoning would not <br />allow more than ^ . 3 separate parcels withoutallow development of the 3 separai. <br />extreme variances. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />1. Review the zoning issues with the property owner. <br />2. If Pf°P®P'^y °""*ll”be*^charged^/o*r units <br />properties. <br />' • Sflf - remove"ri^ln^f °rL ^a“bins and^cSe llTl <br />parcels into !• <br />324/3 3 2 Westlake street -_§1 ake p^a^rc^ls. <br />acre property consists variances for upgrading <br />The applicant had been granted va City agreed <br />tSe residence on the southern "°%erty bfsed on future <br />applicant^ <br />^o fnl irese are still 2 <br />separate commonly owned tax parcels. <br />staff Recommendations renews the <br />expL%'d‘’vartlnle"a^*d fallows \h/ough with his original <br />proposal . <br />D. 3865 Bayside - ^The®property^o^ers <br />2 tax parcels, totaling 1.9 acres. P requested 2in signing their original appeal waiver re^qu <br />sewer units. The existing residen obviously <br />smaller of the 2 parcels. f^ain ^him the <br />wants 2 sewer units only if that will <3 <br />ability to build a second residence. <br />From a zoning code standpoint, the a* single <br />combination of properties should be Q^imately <br />unit. Under the 2 acre standards the appr . <br />200' of shoreline would allow only 1 unit^ <br />even if there was enough acreage for %®®=°"4heriy <br />Also, although there are 2 tax parcels, th <br />C. <br />A