Laserfiche WebLink
■km*,7-^* ^" 4-’f ’ *‘'•\''' v{ ^V — ^ -■‘.‘ '■ I.'^ ■ ^ * 4 V '^*«. . •#:k^: <br />% <br />4 ». *'>• •» <br />I *►' '4 *^‘ *^‘ > "T** It--.(.v.-op,.'-''' <br />SORQNOi <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2318________ <br />A XBSOLDTXOa GRANTZB6 <br />A VARZAHCS TO <br />KoncxPAL zoaniG coos <br />SKTXOI 10.23, SOBOXVISIOI 6 (A) S (B) <br />FZX2 «1104 <br />WBBRZAS, Gregg Perl, (hereinafter *the applicant*) it the owner <br />of the property located at 309 Westlake Street within the City of Orono <br />(hereinafter "City”) and legally described as followtt <br />Lots 1, 2, and 3 except the West 270* of said lets. Block 2, Billside <br />Pari., Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />wrzRZAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (A) to pemit the <br />construction of a primary residential structure 35* in defined height where <br />a defined height of only 30* is normally allowed, and a variance to Section <br />10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a 12* side setback for that structure <br />where a 30* side setback is normally required, and to allow a 27.1* rear <br />setback where a 50* rear setback is normally required. <br />Minnesota t <br />■OW, THERBPORB, BE XT RESOLVED <br />X <br />1. Thisjiapplication ^was reviewed as tZoning^File ,4^ <br />/ i:.'?.^2* 5^The rproperty , i s |locatedViii j theTLR-lJ^fsi^g ’] <br />Residential’.Zoning District. <br />Lakeshore <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed thiarapplication^on^ <br />February 17, 1987 and November 16, 1987, and recommended approve 1'*of .-?r <br />the proposed variances based upon the following findings; <br />A) Approval of the variance for a side setback of 12', finding* <br />that the neighboring rasidence structure located at that side is <br />more than 60* away, and this variance will not cause any <br />significant encroachment on light, air or open space in the <br />neighborhood. <br />B) Approval of a variance for rear setback of 27.1 feet finding <br />that the steep slopes behind the house makes it unlikely that a <br />house could feasibly be constructed on the property to the rear <br />and that that neighboring property to the rear is substandard in <br />size, does not have sewer available, and it is unlikely that a <br />house could feasibly be constructed on that property except near <br />Tonkawa Road, far from applicant's house. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />*\ '* j r •%