My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-02-1994 Planning Work Session
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
02-02-1994 Planning Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 3:21:04 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 3:19:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLNLTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO;\LMIiiSION WORK SESSION <br />WEDNESDAY. JANX'ARY 5. 1994 <br />Brown noted he had been involved in trail planning in Carver County, and his experience with <br />landowners had been that they generally have no problem with snowmobiles as lone as they <br />« A amSlav out of mv vard". <br />Schroedcr moved the discussion along to the conditional use list, leaving cross country skiing <br />and snowmobile sales/rental'service/lake operations base for further discussion later. <br />Schroeder noted that "transient boat launching" means a manna would essentially act as a public <br />access ramp. After brief discussion. Planning Commission agreed that transient boat launching <br />was a reasonable conditiorul use as along as parking is addressed, and ultimately might reduce <br />car-trailer parking on the street. <br />Regarding boat clubs. Schroeder defined them as "multiple persons sharing in the use of a single <br />boat", resulting in more hours of usage for a smgle boat as compared to the normal single owner <br />siniation. Rowlelte indicated her family doesn’t boat on weekends due to overcrowding of the <br />lake. Richie Anderson suggested that 6-8 individual members was t> pical per boat in a boat club <br />and that the boat club concept would not increase boat density’ on the lake given that the 8 users <br />have only a single boat, whereas 8 individual boats being used by 8 owners would certainly <br />increase densitv. Ma’ousth questioned the parking needs for boat clubs. Rowlette indicated the <br />concept would-be a problem if for instance, every smgle slip at a marina was devoted to boat <br />club use, which would potentially yield every one of the slipped boats being used all the time. <br />Hilbelink suggested that a boat club is no different than a rental boat simation in terms of <br />amount of usage per boat. Schroeder made the point that under the normal structure, 100 boats <br />could be used individually by 100 families, but under a boat club structure, those 100 boats <br />could be used by 600 families, and the relative amount of usage of those 100 boats would <br />increase substantially. Parking would not necessarily be an issue, because not all 600 families <br />would be there at once. <br />Regarding on-demand launch of customer’s boat stored on site, Gaffron noted that this could be <br />accomplished bv drv stack, or by boats sitting on traders outside. The theory is that the <br />customer would'calfahead, telling the marina to have their boat in the water and ready to go m <br />an hour Rowlette noted this was quite prevalent in Florida and other areas, but net as common <br />vet in Orono She also suggested she would rather see such storage inside buddings rather than <br />outside. Gaffron noted ^hat while Orono has historically only allowed North Shore Drive <br />Marina the use of 20 of its 72 dry stack spaces for boats for lake use, the LMCD licenses all <br />72 as lake use slips. The fallacy is that LMCD doesn’t count boats stored on trailers for lake <br />use in their licensing count. <br />Schroeder suggested that the Planning Commission may at some point address the boat density <br />issue, and needs to be thinking about standards and regulations for parking at mannas.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.