Laserfiche WebLink
(Rev.1-91) <br />J <br />1) Whether the facility will obstruct or occupy too <br />great an area of the public water in relationship to its <br />utility to the general public. <br />2) Whether the proposed facility will serve <br />general public as opposed to a limited segment of the public <br />or a limited geographical area. <br />3) Whether the proposed facility will be compatible <br />with the adjacent water use area. <br />4) Whether the proposed facility will be compatible <br />with the adjacent riparian zoning. <br />5) Whether adequate water depth is available for the <br />proposed facility without churning of the bottom sediments. <br />6) Whether the proposed facility will create a volume <br />of traffic on the Lake in the vicinity of the <br />will tend to be unsafe or which will cause an undue burden <br />on traffic upon the Lake in the vicinity of the facility. <br />7) Whether the proposed facility is compatible with <br />the LMCD watercraft density classification criteria. <br />8) Whether the facility will comply with the <br />regulations contained in this ordinance. <br />9) Whether the proposed <br />with the maintenance of the natural beauty of the La<e. <br />10) Whether the proposed ^ ^he <br />quality of the water of the Lake and the ecology <br />Lake. <br />11) Whether the proposed facility, '’V, Fff" <br />fumes or other nuisance the vicinitysource of nuisance or annoyance to persons in the vicinity <br />of the facility. <br />12) Whether adequate sanitary and parking facilitie <br />will ie provider in connection with the proposed facUtty. <br />13) Whether the multiple doclr or mooring area will be <br />structuLlly safe for use by the intended users. <br />14) Whether the '’'watercraft <br />additional permanent non-transienc <br />storage on the Lake. <br />15) Whether the f^imental impact of ^_^the^^p|oP«ed <br />facility will be reduced ^"‘^efined infection 1.02.are not restricted watercraft as detinea