Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO Pl.ANMNG COMMISSION WORK SESSION <br />WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2. 1994 <br />Item II is the prohibited use of ru>n-encased expanded-bcad polystyrene team as a dock notation <br />material. Nolan questioiK'd the I'utdated la\xs ot the LMCD. Gattron pointed out in Subd. 18 <br />the City adopted OrdinatK.es of the LMCD from the 1970s. Since that time, the LMCD has <br />changed those Ordinances and added others. Rowletle commented that reference should not be <br />made to the LMCD but adopt the same standards. Gaffron asked at what point dt> you wan' the <br />City of Orono to assume jurisdiction on the lake side which then encroaches LMCD. Gattron <br />explained that cities surrounding Lake Minnetonka are voting on dissolution of the LMCD. <br />Nolan felt docks should have building standards. Before Rowlette left she asked that Item K, <br />winter boat density/storage be discussed. She requested that blue winter covers be eliminated <br />and .suggested the use of white only for boats which would blend in with the snow-. Rich <br />Anderson said he has noticed that residents use boat coverings of various colors and some yards <br />do m>t kH)k much better than marinas. Rowlette explained that if there is not a considerable <br />price differential, the choice should be white for shrink wrap material. <br />The next topic was fishing tournaments. Gaffron explained the City, LMCD. Water Patrol and <br />DNR all issue permits for fishing tournaments. Orono’s permit is issued by the Police <br />Department. He said fishing tournament problems are usually associated with traffic and noise <br />and those problems need to be enforced by the various agencies. After discussion, Peterson felt <br />that fishing tournaments could be better handled under the "Parades and Special pAents" section <br />of the c(xle and not in the B-2. <br />Peterson asked if there were other items to be discussed. lx*e Fishback asked if a decision had <br />actually been made to change lot area to 5 acres. Berg explained the item of lot area was <br />discussed but no conclusion had been made. Rich Anderson added it seems arbitrary to increase <br />lot area size from 2 to 5 acres Peterson felt it needs to be kwked at further and should either <br />be increased or eliminated. Gaffron reiterated his previous statement regarding what the City <br />might want to happen with that property and then tailor acreage numbers to encourage those <br />results. <br />Dunn addressed Items I and K regarding land density and expressed his concern with on land <br />authority if the LMCD’s jurisdiction is eliminated. <br />Gaffron notified everyone the next work session meeting is scheduled for Wedne.sday. February <br />23rd at 7:00 p m. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />The meetiiui was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. <br />Stephen Peterson, Vice-Chair