Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1909 <br />March 17. 1994 <br />Pace 4 <br />bluff would be ai approxunaiely jeHned loc is 27^1. Start will <br />at U.e 950 elevation, the average pe^e^ge of slope trom me <br />accept the 950 elevation as the top of the slope. <br />issiia for Consideration <br />1. Review Exhibit P. The house.^ The foundation <br />!;r*Aras tetlTw^ Rather tL a patio bet«ath deck, what about a lower dech <br />bei^ insulled and allow grades to remain as is. <br />, Review Exhtbits M, N andO, P>“ “ <br />bluff impact zone requited „ Gustafson cannot approve as boulder wallspropose boulder walls. Review Exhibit O. Gu t^^^^^^ ^ <br />Lnnot be ceitined by an engineer. ' f npe of fill, and type of <br />Gustafson asked for specilic information r'^^^^^hat “ must Ik separated <br />tie back restraints to be used. His reps j j „ „„ further filling within the bluff <br />at least 4 ’. What is Planning ^0"’™“^ ^ ooJ^of lakeside of the bluff? Is <br />.t,»»i.... .< ~ <br />application. <br />concerning the type of wall to be installed. <br />^ structure is to be located on bluff '"aLP>» <br />of landscaping/screenmg will \x require Guilder has advised that no <br />not address the lakeshore a code will allow access paths, picnic <br />changes are proposed in lower ™ be given to the removal ot <br />areas within the bluff impact zone. Special attention m <br />plantings on bluff. <br />Staff was pleased to see the proposed ^ oTs^letbKk <br />Staff secs no problem with this as long ^ considered. In any event, this <br />area. If outlet velocity is of "P staff and the City Engineer. As far <br />is a matter that can be reviewed in ^^ ^^v potential erosion of the steep <br />as staff is concerned, it makes good sense to minimize any p <br />3. <br />5.