My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
03-21-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 3:18:17 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 3:15:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning #1898 <br />March 15. 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Original proposal » 3,482 s.f. or 30.8% (657 s.f. or 5.8% variance) <br />Amended proposal = 3,233 s.f. or 28.6% (reduction of original garage at 75 s.f.. <br />removal of drive 69 s.f. and steps at 106 s.f.) <br />Variance = 408 s.f. or 3.6% <br />250-500’ setback area = 3,300 s.f. <br />Allowed = 990 s.f. or 30% <br />Existing = 1.880 s.f. or 56.9% <br />Proposed = 990 s.f. or 30% <br />No variance required <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Amended hardcover proposal <br />B - Site Plan/Floor Plan Upper Level Garage <br />C - Minutes of 1/18/94 Planning Commission Meeting <br />D - 1988 Survey <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants have submitted a revised proposal resulting in hardcover reductions from 30.8% to <br />28.6%. The garage has been reduced by 75 s.f. and the driveway by 69 s.f. The 106 s.f. of <br />wood steps should be designated by applicants. Staff has enclosed the 1988 survey that <br />designates a wooden stair/step structure in lakeshore yard. Applicants should specify if this is <br />the structure to be removed. <br />Planning Commission members did advise applicants that they have no problem with the setback <br />variances rquired for deck and proposed breakfast nook area. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. <br />2. <br />Have applicants responded to Planning Commission’s directives set forth in minutes of <br />meeting (Exhibit C)? <br />Has the reduction in the garage area met intent of Planning Commission <br />recommendation? Note lot coverage or structural coverage is proposed at 12.9%. <br />Hardcover in the 250-500’ setback area has been reduced from 52.6% to 30%. Is the <br />reduction in hardcover within the 75-250’ setback area sufficient.^ —Existing at 19.3% <br />and proposed at 28.6% (25% allowed). Are there other hardcover improvements that <br />should 1^ considered for removal?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.