Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1908 <br />March 16, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Section 10.22, Subd. KB) - Average lakeshore setback variance. <br />Allowed = 0 <br />Existing ~ 90’ <br />Proposed = 20’ <br />List ot Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Property Owners List <br />C - Plat Map <br />D - Hardcover Inventory <br />E - Rear and Side Elevations <br />F - Front Elevations/Floor Plan <br />G - Site Plan/Preliminary Subdivision Locating Drainfield Area <br />H - Survey of Property <br />I - Resolution #3264 <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes installation of a 12’xl8’ storage shed to be placed on a cement slab^ <br />Structure will )e completely located within flood fringe district requiring variance and <br />conditional use permit. Principal structure was approved at a 90’ encroachment of an average <br />lakeshore setback. The proposed accessory structure will be located 20 in front of the average <br />lakeshore setback. The same hardships noted for the approval of the seasonal cabin can be made <br />for the proposed storage, review Exhibit I. The higher elevations to the north minimize any <br />visual impact by the approximate 12’ high struemre. <br />The applicant has commenced the filing of the petmit review pr«ess with the Watersht^ <br />District In an earlier conversation with Ellen Sones of the Watershed District, she ^vtsed that <br />as the stmeture is an accessory struemte and if it is placed at grade on a cement slab with no <br />ftitther encroachment of the flood fringe elevations, the structure would be approved as <br />proposed. <br />Review Exhibit G preliminary site plan of the earlier subdivision review locating septic system. <br />w»W^ approxLtely 40’ from septic tanks. The code would require a 20’ <br />setback. The structure meets all other setback standards except for the average lakeshore <br />setback.