My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
01-18-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2023 1:52:55 PM
Creation date
10/5/2023 1:49:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINXTES OF THE ORONO PLANMNO COMMISSION MFKTIN(; <br />HKl.n tx TOBER 18, 1993 <br />(#10) #1877 TANDEM PROPERTIES PETER ANDREA COMPANA - CONT. <br />Dcanovic thoucht that it could be maintained pnvatcly after talking N^ith Pat Dickey. Although <br />desirable .« use. .. would be more exr.-ns,ve Sm„h would hke .0 Uk see <br />the bam kept at least in its present condition. <br />I>utnam eommcnied ih.it there were other eonsiderations for the bam site Parking has been a <br />problem for users of the Luee Line and this sue could be a posstbility to provide parking and <br />some use of the bam. <br />Smith asked if the DNR would be interested in working on the trail idea connecting to <br />Line. Putnam stated that as a regional trail, this would mn meet the criteria but as an ottshoo <br />for the municipality it would make a lot of sense. <br />Smith asked if the desicnated trails were on outlots so they could be converted to roads if that <br />was ever desired Putnam responded that discussions had taken place w ith agencies such as the <br />Fish and Wildlife Department and Corps of Engineers to create a dra.nage system ot <br />^nlds that do not currently exist. The trail would be 25-30’ wide and publicly dedicated but not <br />a road. <br />vcmith -isked if the location where the sweat lodges are could be protected. Putnam responded <br />Ltfhere is no significance to where they are placed, that was just the most convenient location. <br />Putnam stated that as developers they would like to try to create a path so that everyone benetiB <br />“city saw that paVh has to be subtracted from the 2-aere lot area. K "tay no. <br />wlhw hUe, For '.he person owning a lot and seUntg. t. may be better no. to have the tratl. <br />However, for the benefit of the whole area, a trail makes a lot of sense. <br />Schrtteder asked the sums of the trail along Old Cry stal Bay Road Gaffron though, things had <br />tome to a halt and did no. know how the agreements with the property owners along the trail <br />h^d turned out. Money continues lo be a problem. <br />Peterson asked what the feelings were about the possible choice of a southern eotridor for <br />Highway 12 as it would greatly intpati their property. Putnam lell there was some risk but <br />added that development could discourage this route as the final choice. <br />Peterson stated that the proposal looks good but has a concern with the wetland <br />win it be handled tf there is no septic site available on some of the lots and how w.ll the lots be <br />designed since there are wetlands scattered throughout the property?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.